Published Mar 22, 2024 Goodhart’s Law is an adage named after British economist Charles Goodhart, which he originally formulated in the context of economic measures. It states that “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” The essence of Goodhart’s Law is that once a specific measure of performance is used as a target for conduct, its reliability as an indicator of success becomes compromised. This is because individuals or organizations will start to manipulate the system or change their behavior in ways that optimize for the target measure, often at the expense of broader objectives. To illustrate Goodhart’s Law, consider a university that aims to improve its academic standing. It decides to use the number of published research papers as a measure of faculty performance, setting specific targets for publications. Initially, the measure seems to reflect faculty productivity and the university’s academic contributions accurately. However, as faculty members realize that their performance and possible promotions are judged by this metric, they start to focus solely on increasing their number of publications. This could lead to a range of unintended outcomes, such as the publication of lower-quality research, the division of substantial studies into minimal publishable units (often referred to as “salami slicing”), or even unethical practices like data manipulation. Here, the initial measure — the number of publications — ceases to be a good indicator of genuine academic contribution, as it incentivizes behaviors that inflate numbers without necessarily contributing to the quality or impact of research. Goodhart’s Law matters because it highlights a fundamental challenge in management and policy-making: the difficulty of designing measures and incentives that genuinely align with desired outcomes. It reminds us that the tools we use to guide behavior and assess performance can, if not carefully managed, lead to perverse incentives and counterproductive outcomes. Understanding this principle is crucial for anyone involved in setting performance metrics, whether in business, education, public policy, or any other field. By being aware of Goodhart’s Law, organizations and policymakers can strive to create more robust systems of measurement and incentive that are less susceptible to gaming or manipulation. Organizations can mitigate the effects of Goodhart’s Law by employing a combination of strategies. These include using multiple indicators to assess performance, ensuring that measures are aligned with the broader objectives, and regularly revising metrics to avoid them becoming targets for manipulation. Moreover, incorporating qualitative assessments and fostering an organizational culture that values honesty and integrity over merely meeting targets can also help reduce the risk. No, Goodhart’s Law is not limited to economic or financial measures. It applies broadly to any context where measures or metrics are used to guide behavior or assess performance. This could include healthcare, education, law enforcement, corporate management, and more. The principle underscores a universal challenge in creating measures that do not become counterproductive when used as targets. Yes, Goodhart’s Law can help explain the failure of well-intentioned policies. When policies are designed around specific measures as targets, individuals or entities subjected to these policies may optimize their behavior to meet these targets, often through unintended or undesirable ways. This optimization can lead to outcomes that deviate significantly from the policy’s original goals, making the policy less effective or even counterproductive.Definition of Goodhart’s Law
Example
Why Goodhart’s Law Matters
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How can organizations avoid the pitfalls described by Goodhart’s Law?
Does Goodhart’s Law apply only to economic or financial measures?
Can Goodhart’s Law explain why sometimes well-intentioned policies fail?
Economics