Published Mar 22, 2024 The Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) is an economic metric that measures the proportion of each additional unit of household income that is saved rather than spent on consumption. It is a concept central to Keynesian economics, representing how much of an extra dollar of income will be saved by households. Mathematically, MPS is defined as the change in saving (ΔS) divided by the change in disposable income (ΔY), i.e., MPS = ΔS / ΔY. This concept is crucial in understanding the savings behavior of individuals and its impact on the overall economy. Imagine an individual, Alice, who receives a bonus of $1,000 at her job. If Alice decides to save $200 of this bonus and spend the remaining $800 on goods and services, her marginal propensity to save will be 0.2 ($200 / $1,000). This means that for every additional dollar Alice earns, she saves 20 cents and spends 80 cents. This concept can be applied at a broader level to understand the saving behaviors of entire economies. For instance, if an economy exhibits a high MPS, it indicates that individuals in that economy tend to save a larger portion of additional income, which may influence the effectiveness of fiscal policies aimed at stimulating economic activity through increased spending. The MPS is a fundamental concept in Keynesian economics, particularly in the context of the consumption function and the multiplier effect. It helps economists and policymakers understand how changes in income levels may affect savings and spending patterns within an economy. A higher MPS suggests that a smaller portion of income will be spent on consumption, which can lead to slower economic growth in the short term but might contribute to investment and thus economic growth in the long term. Moreover, understanding the MPS helps in formulating and adjusting fiscal policies, especially in times of economic downturns or recessions. For example, if the government knows that the MPS is high, it may opt for policies that directly increase spending (rather than income) to stimulate the economy more effectively. The Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) and the Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) are directly related and complementary, with the sum of the two always equaling 1. This is because any addition to disposable income must either be saved or spent. If the MPC is 0.8, then the MPS will be 0.2, indicating that for every additional unit of income, 80% is spent, and 20% is saved. Yes, the MPS can change over time due to various factors, including changes in income levels, economic expectations, interest rates, and fiscal policies. For example, during periods of economic uncertainty, individuals may choose to save more of their additional income, leading to an increase in the MPS. Similarly, attractive interest rates on savings accounts may encourage more saving, thus increasing the MPS. The MPS plays a critical role in determining the size of the multiplier effect in Keynesian economics. The multiplier effect describes how an initial change in spending (or income) leads to a larger change in national income. The smaller the MPS (meaning the higher the MPC), the larger the multiplier effect. This is because more of each additional unit of income is spent, leading to a greater overall increase in national income through successive rounds of spending. For example, in an economy with a low MPS, government spending can lead to significant increases in aggregate demand and income levels due to the high propensity of individuals to spend additional income. Conversely, in an economy with a high MPS, the same fiscal stimulus would result in a smaller increase in national income, as more of the additional income would be saved rather than spent. ###Definition of Marginal Propensity to Save
Example
Why Marginal Propensity to Save Matters
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How does the marginal propensity to save relate to the marginal propensity to consume?
Can the marginal propensity to save change over time?
What role does the marginal propensity to save play in the multiplier effect?
Economics